| LEVEL I | FORMAL DISCUSSION |
| In cases of minor misconduct and offenses, supervisors should utilize the formal discussion level of the disciplinary procedure. Proper documentation concerning the discussion should be kept on file by the supervisor. | |
| LEVEL II | ORAL WARNING |
| The oral warning level of the disciplinary procedure should be utilized for misconduct that occurs after the formal discussion. An oral warning may be issued without a formal discussion should the misconduct warrant such action. A summary of the oral warning should be documented on the disciplinary form and signed by the employee being issued the warning and the supervisor issuing the warning. A copy of this document will become part of the employees official personnel file. | |
| LEVEL III | WRITTEN WARNING |
| The written warning is issued for misconduct that occurs after an oral warning. A written warning may be given instead of an oral warning should the misconduct warrant such action. A written warning should be documented using the disciplinary form. Should a written warning be issued as an extension to a previous warning, the prior warning should be referenced. The written warning should be signed by the employee being issued the warning and the supervisor. A copy of the warning will become part of the employee's official personnel file. | |
| LEVEL IV | SUSPENSION |
| A suspension (with or without pay) may be imposed should misconduct continue after a written warning has been issued. A suspension may be the first level in the disciplinary procedure should the misconduct warrant such action. The employee should be notified of a suspension in writing using the disciplinary form, with terms of the suspension clearly stated. The notice should be signed by the employee and submitted to the Office of Human Resources for inclusion in the employee's official personnel file. No annual or sick leave will be earned during any suspension. | |
| LEVEL V | TERMINATION |
| While the University may use any of the above levels prior to termination, termination may also be the first level of the disciplinary procedure. In this event, an Intent to Terminate will be issued. The Intent to Terminate may be the first level in the disciplinary procedure should the misconduct warrants such action. |
608.2.2 Procedures Ensuring Intent to Terminate
An employee entitled to a hearing by virtue of a Notice of Intent to Terminate shall have two working days from the date of receipt of the notice of intent to request a hearing before an appeals committee. If the employee does not request a hearing, the employee's salary ceases at the end of the second working day following the receipt of the notice of intent. If the employee requests a hearing, the hearing shall occur within five working days of the receipt of the notice of intent to terminate. The decision of the committee (to uphold or reverse the intent) will be presented to the Office of the Chancellor, or to the appropriate campus Vice Chancellor as a recommendation regarding the termination. In matters of dismissal, final authority resides in the Office of the Chancellor.
A committee of impartial employees with no direct relationship to the situation involved will be appointed by the Chair of the Personnel Advisory Committee. The appellant may select another University employee to appear with him/her before the Appeals Committee. The committee may discuss the appeals with the employee's supervisors or other University employees. The committee will accumulate and study the statements of fact in the case. The employee(s) and the supervisor will be notified, in writing, at least three (3) working days before the case will be heard by the committee. The appeals hearing is an internal and informal procedure, but the appellant may bring a representative to the hearing for advisement purposes only. If this person is an attorney, he/she will act solely in an advisory capacity to the employee and will not be permitted to take a direct role in the proceedings.
A reasonable time shall be set aside to conduct the hearing in order to provide ample time for presentation of all materials by both parties. Pertinent materials should be made available to the subcommittee at the scheduled hearing. A general outline of the order of procedure should be provided by the Chair of the sub-committee. A list of all involved persons, such as witnesses, will be distributed to the members of the subcommittee.
The University reserves the right to have its attorney(s) present. Also, if he/she wishes, the employee may have a maximum of two (2) witnesses. The committee reserves the right to call additional witnesses if the situation warrants this action. The parties interested will be notified as to the time and place of the meeting. Failure of either party to appear shall not prejudice the case nor prevent the committee from hearing the case and rendering a decision. If the proceedings concern a group appeal, no more than three (3) members of the group may be present at the review.
The Appeals Committee will submit a written report and recommendations, which are advisory only, to the Office of the Chancellor. The Office of the Chancellor will provide a final determination of each appeal reaching that level. Copies of the decision will be provided to the appellant and all parties involved within ten (10) working days (unless a longer time is mutually agreed upon).
NOTE: When warranted by unusual circumstances (illness, extended absence, etc.) the Human Resource Director may extend or modify time limits in this procedure and the committee may waive the limits set by the procedure as it pertains to the number of witnesses in unusual circumstances.